Citizen Bloggers Present the Facts about Obama that the Main Stream Media Tries to Hide!

Radical Racist Obama Protesting at Harvard in 1991

Honoring the Memory of Andrew Breitbart

“The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama”

via The Palin Express

Jun 4 Written by: Diana West
Friday, June 04, 2010 5:55 AM 

 One of the bonuses of writing a syndicated column is the mail that comes in from across the country, from outside the Beltway and beyond the Bos-Wash corridor, often presenting the opportunity for fruitful exchange with similarly concerned fellow-citizens. One such exchange, which has been going on for years now and has developed into a long-distance friendship, is with John L. Work, a retired policeman and detective in Colorado with 24 years service in law enforcement and investigation with police and sheriff’s office, as well as the Colorado public defender’s office.

John, whose analysis has appeared at this website from time to time, has pulled together something very unusual and important, which I am publishing below. It is in the form of an affadavit, the kind of document he used to put together as a detective, amassing evidence in this case about the apparent concealment of documents attesting to the identity and activities of President Barack Hussein Obama. The fact is, the birth certificate controversy is only the beginning of the presidential mystery. There is so much we don’t know for certain about President Obama. Inexplicably but intriguigingly, he has failed to produce his bona fides, while the media (and the White House media in particular), who could ask for them, don’t care, or don’t want to care.

I culled from John’s affadavit what is undoubtedly an incomplete list of the Obama documents that we, the people, have just never gotten a look at due to Obama’s decision not to let us look.

Sure, there’s (1) the original, long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate. Then there’s:

2) Marriage license between Obama’s father (Barak Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham) — not found, not released
3) Obama’s  baptism records — sealed
4) Obama’s adoption records — sealed
5)  Records of Obama’s and his mother’s reptriation as US citizens on return from Indonesia — not found, not released
6) Name change (Barry Sotero to Barack Hussein Obama) records — not found, not released
7) Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) — not released
8) Punahou School financial aid or school records — not released
9) Occidental College financial aid records — not released. (These records were, however, subpoenaed but Obama lawyers succeeded in  quashing the subpoena in court. No other Occi records have been released.)
10) Columbia College records — not released
11) Columbia senior thesis — not released
12) Harvard Law School records (not mentioned below, but not released)
13) Obama’s law  client list — sealed
14) Obama’s files from career as an Illinois State Senator — sealed
15) Obama’s record with Illinois State Bar Association — sealed
16)  Obama’s medical records — not released
17) Obama’s passport records — not released
 
That’s a lot of records sealed and not released. But there’s much more to “the case.” Read it and see what you as an American citizen think. 

The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama

The writer, John L. Work, a retired commissioned Colorado Peace Officer and a citizen of the United States of America, herein presents the following facts and circumstances regarding The President of The United States, Barack Hussein Obama.  This writer states to this Honorable Court of Public Opinion that Barack Hussein Obama has failed to truthfully disclose to the American People a substantial amount of documentary evidence about his origins and history, to wit:

Barack Hussein Obama, AKA Barry Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, AKA Barry Dunham, DOB 8-4-1961, the duly elected and sworn President of The United States of America, has not proven that he is Constitutionally eligible to hold that Office.  The reasons this writer believes this to be true are as follows:

Former Pennsylvania Deputy Attorney General Phillip Berg states in a lawsuit filed in 2008 that Obama’s father, Barack Obama, Sr., was at the time of Barack, Jr.’s birth a British subject of Kenya, Africa.

 Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (DOB 11-29-1942), was not old enough to legally confer American citizenship on Barack, Jr. at his birth.

 Affidavits sworn to and signed by Rev. Kweli Shuhubia and Bishop Ron McRae say that Obama’s paternal grandmother, Sarah Obama, stated during an interview conducted in both the Swahili and English languages that she was present  at Barack Obama, Jr.’s birth in Mombasa, Kenya.

 Publication of Hawaiian newspaper birth announcements in 1961 did not necessarily constitute proof that a birth actually occurred within the State and offer no legal substantiation of citizenship in and of themselves;  further, during 1961  Hawaii’s law allowed issuance of Hawaiian birth certification for babies born outside the United States 

 In his book “Dreams from My Father” Obama claims that, following his birth, his married parents lived together in Hawaii until 1962.  Jerome Corsi (Ph.D. Harvard University), an internationally recognized scholar, author and investigative reporter, has discovered documentary evidence which shows that in fact Stanley Ann Dunham and her new-born son Barack, Jr., moved to Seattle, Washington within two weeks of his birth;  and that Stanley Ann started Fall semester classes there as a university student. 

 Jerome Corsi has been unable to locate any recorded evidence in Hawaii of either a marriage between Barack, Sr. and Stanley Dunham, or that they ever lived together.   

 Aaron Klein, author of The Manchurian President,  reported in the October 27, 2009 World Net Daily that Obama’s wife, Michelle Obama, publicly stated that Stanley Ann Dunham was single when she had Barack, Jr. 

 The Maui News published a report on January 21, 2009, in which former teachers Aimee Yatsushiro and Katherine Nakamoto said that Obama attended Noelani Elementary School from 1966 to 1967.  No records from the school have been released. 

 Circa 1967 Stanley Ann Dunham married an Indonesian Muslim named Lolo Soetoro (DOB circa 1935).   

 The Soetoros lived in Jakarta, Indonesia where Barack, Jr. attended Franciskus Assissi school under the name Barry Soetoro, registered as a Muslim. He later attended an Indonesian  public school. 

 Stanley Soetoro divorced Lolo in 1980.  No records of either Stanley Ann’s or Barry Soetoro’s repatriation as citizens of the United States from Indonesia have been released.  No name change records have been released. 

 A report published by Chelsea Schilling on 6-9-2009 in World Net Daily says:  a) that Obama attended Punahou School in Honolulu on a scholarship from 5th through 12th grades, and graduated in 1979.  b)  that none of Obama’s Punahou school financial records have been released. 

 Schilling’s report further states:  a)  that Obama attended Occidental College in Los Angeles from 1979 to 1981.  b)  that attorney Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice Foundation served a subpoena on the College for Obama’s financial and scholarship records in order to determine if Obama, who was studying on a scholarship, attended Occidental as a foreign national.  c)  that attorneys for Obama intervened and got the subpoena quashed in Court.  d)  that none of Obama’s Occidental financial records have been released. 

 Schilling’s report also states:  a)  In 1982 Obama transferred from Occidental to Columbia University in NYC.  b)  that while he claims to have been active in the Black Student Organization, no one among a number of prominent student leaders interviewed by the New York Times recalled Obama being there.  c)  that Fox News contacted 400 Columbia students from that time period – and not one of them remembered him.  d)  that Obama graduated from Columbia in 1983, but school officials claim they do not have a copy of his senior thesis.  e)  that Obama has refused to release his Columbia transcripts. 

 Schilling’s report further states that Obama entered Harvard University Law School, graduated in 1991 and that he served as the Editor of The Harvard Law Review. 

 Schilling’s report also says:  a)  that Obama has not released his medical records.  b)  that Obama’s passport records have never been released  c)  that Obama at one point in his life traveled to Pakistan, using a passport of unknown origin   d)  that all files from Obama’s years as an Illinois State Senator are sealed.  e)  that Obama’s law client list is sealed.  f)  that Obama’s records with the Illinois State Bar Association are sealed.  g)  that Obama’s baptism records are sealed.  h)  that Obama’s adoption records are sealed. 

 An AP report published on 6-27-2004 in the Sunday Standard online edition states that Obama was born in Kenya. 

 Mayhill Fowler reported in the April 7, 2008 Huffington Post on an Obama April 6, 2008 fundraiser speech, during which Obama claimed to have traveled to Pakistan when he was in college.  On 4-18-2010 this writer followed Mayhill’s link to an audio-recording of the speech and found that it has been removed from the site.

Jerome Corsi reported in World Net Daily on 10-26-2008 that Obama’s original long-form birth certificate is sealed by Hawaii’s Governor, Linda Lingle. 

 On 11-13-2008, attorney at law and author Debbie Schlussel published a copyrighted report of an investigation she commissioned to be done by retired ICE Agent Stephen Coffman into Obama’s Selective Service registration documents.  Coffman’s evidentiary findings led to Schlussel’s conclusion that Barack Obama “…either didn’t register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently…”

 On 8-10-2009 Hawaii Department of Health spokesperson Janet Okubo refused to verify the authenticity of an image, generated by computer and released to the press corps by Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt.  LaBolt said that the image depicted was Barack Obama’s birth certificate.  Okubo also refused to confirm the veracity of a second and different online computer-generated Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth, posted by FactCheck.org.

On October 1, 2009, Susan Daniels, a citizen of the State of Ohio and a licensed private investigator for the plaintiffs in United States District Court Case SACV09-00082-DOC (Anx), Captain Pamela Barnett et al v. Defendants Barack Hussein Obama, Michelle L. R. Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M. Gates, and Joseph R. Biden, filed an affidavit with the Court.  Daniels’ affidavit states that she has found evidence proving that Barack Obama’s Social Security Number was issued by the State of Connecticut between 1977 and 1979; further, that Obama’s Social Security Number appears to be originally associated with a man who was born in the 1890s and is now deceased.

 Susan Daniels filed a second affidavit with the Court on October 19, 2009, which says that further investigation uncovered eight different Social Security Numbers for Barack Hussein Obama in addition to the number to which she alluded in her first affidavit, and two different Social Security Numbers for Michelle Obama.

 This writer states to this Honorable Court of Public Opinion that there is no known evidence of record to this date which shows that Barack Hussein Obama ever lived in Connecticut.

 Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution of The United States of America mandates that “…No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States…”

Wherefore, this writer believes he has shown reasonable grounds to believe that Barack Hussein Obama has deliberately, unreasonably and with guile concealed nearly all records of his personal documented history from public scrutiny;  and that requests to view those records are reasonable, rational and within the American People’s province. This writer believes the People of The United States have a right and responsibility to demand that all of the afore-described sealed records be released in order that the electorate may examine them to finally determine who Barack Hussein Obama really is, and whence he came.

See the Original Story at:

http://thepalinexpress.wordpress.com/2010/12/28/obamas-missing-and-sealed-records/

Any Questions?

70 responses to “Citizen Bloggers Present the Facts about Obama that the Main Stream Media Tries to Hide!

  1. Good Morning America :D

  2. Pingback: Citizen Bloggers Present the Facts about Obama that the Main Stream Media Tries to Hide! | Voting American « ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+. ~ (BLOG & EMAIL)

  3. Thank you for re-posting this Gunny G. ;)

  4. Yeah, Citizen Bloggers–the New Pamphleteers!

    The only news is now Citizen Blogged!

    Gunny G
    http://gunnyg.wordpress.com

    Semper Watching!
    *****

  5. Pingback: Citizen Bloggers Present the Facts about Obama that the Main Stream Media Tries to Hide! | a12iggymom's Blog

  6. Thank you for re-posting this my friends at a12iggymom’s Blog

  7. It couldn’t be more clear that this man is a big fraud, but it just doesn’t seem to matter to some. I often wonder how the media will react when the truth really comes out. Will they continue to defend him, or act shocked at the “betrayal”.

  8. Drudge has posted that Leon Panetta has essentially told congress that the decisions to send our troops into battle zones will be determined by an international consensus, and the administration will inform congress of their decision to do so.
    Congress has been removed from the decision making process.
    That is treason folks.
    That is a dictatorship folks.

    The Obama administration is a cancer on this Great Country and it needs to be halted ASAP.

    • Good find AFVET. Hillary Clinton is working on an agreement at the U.N. that will essentially over ride our Second Amendment Rights.

  9. Re: “during 1961 Hawaii’s law allowed issuance of Hawaiian birth certification for babies born outside the United States .”

    That is not true.

    I have this from the PUMA Lori Starfelt, who tried to prove that Obama was NOT born in Hawaii, and found the contrary.

    “In 1961, the hospitals would take their new birth certificates to Vital Records. At the end of the week, Vital Records would post a sheet that for the newspaper to pick up that contained births, deaths, marriages and divorces. The Advertiser routinely printed this information in their Sunday edition. This is not a paid announcement that his grandmother could arrange. This is information that comes from Vital Records – we know this because this particular section reflects those records. They didn’t have a provision for paid, one sentence announcement that would be included in the Vital Records. At the time, if a child was born outside a hospital, the family would have 30 days to apply for a birth certificate and Vital Records would expect to see prenatal care records, or pediatrician records of the first check up, etc. They’d also want the notarized statement from the mid-wife. Of course, they can apply later but that would noted as a different kind of birth certificate. I think TD has already addressed that. This information was received by Vital Records the first week of his birth = that suggests the hospital.”

    Let me repeat: “At the time, if a child was born outside a hospital, the family would have 30 days to apply for a birth certificate and Vital Records would expect to see prenatal care records, or pediatrician records of the first check up, etc. They’d also want the notarized statement from the mid-wife.”

    What made you think that a person could just waltz in to a Hawaii DOH office and claim that a child was born in Hawaii and get a Hawaii birth certificate with a Hawaii place of birth on it without any proof?

  10. Continuing:

    Dr. Conspiracy put it this way:

    Regarding the allegation that Hawaii allows registration of any child in Hawaii over one year old as being born in Hawaii:

    This comes from misquoting a comment from the Hawaiian Homelands Act of 1911. The Hawaii Department of Health web site says: “The Certificate of Hawaiian Birth program was established in 1911, during the territorial era, to register a person born in Hawaii who was one year old or older and whose birth had not been previously registered in Hawaii.” The misquoted version leaves out “born in Hawaii”. More advanced versions of this theory take into account the Hawaiian birth requirement, suggesting that only minimal documentation was required for such a registration. Any version of this theory is, however, ruled out because Certificates of Hawaiian birth are for registrations of a one year old or older and Obama COLB shows his registration 4 days after his birth. [And so does the long form birth certificate.]

    Regarding the allegation that Hawaii allows residents to register foreign-born infants as being born in Hawaii: Hawaiian Law §338-17.8 says:

    Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child… [L 1982, c 182, §1]

    The law cited preceding did not exist until its passage in 1982 (the “L 1982″) , 21 years after Barack Obama’s birth registration on August 8, 1961.

    Conspiracy theorists suggest that some similar law may have existed before 1982, but this is not true. When Hawaiian law is amended, the previous laws and dates are included in the citation and there is no previous law citation above. In addition, examination of the 1959 code shows no such provision.

    In short, the notices in the newspapers were sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, which only sent out such notices for births in Hawaii, and which could not have been fooled by a claim of a birth at home (because it asked for witnesses) and which did not in 1961 allow foreign births to be registered.

    • I appreciate your concern in posting these comments ehancock but could you please provide us with links and documentation to substantiate your claims rather than the He said, She said stuff you are posting.

  11. Re: “links and documentation to substantiate your claims.”

    Here is Dr. Conspiracy’s site:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2008/12/not_born_in_hawaii/#any

    Other sites:

    Here is the photographic image of the physical copy of the long-form birth certificate that was passed around in the White House Press room, and the statement of the reporter who photographed it that she had felt the raised seal:

    http://lockerz.com/s/96540721

    Here is the photographic image of the physical copy of Obama’s short form birth certificate, front and back.

    http://factcheck.org/2008/08/born-in-the-usa/

    Here is confirmation that it is the official birth certificate that Hawaii issues

    (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574320190095246658.html)

    Here is the first of the confirmations by the officials in Hawaii.

    http://www.kitv.com/r/17860890/detail.html

    Notice where it says that there is an original birth certificate filed. Well, in 1961 foreign birth certificates, even those from other states, could not be filed in Hawaii. So the birth certificate in Obama’s files must be a Hawaii birth certificate.

    Here is the second of the confirmations by the officials in Hawaii.

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-07-27-obama-hawaii_N.htm

    Notice where it says that the document in the files VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii. So, not only is there an official Hawaiian birth certificate in the files, but it says right on it that Obama was born in Hawaii. Hawaii has never allowed the Department of Health to issue a birth document of any kind that says on it that anyone was born in Hawaii unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii, and that is what the officials in Hawaii have confirmed twice.

    And here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican, that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/05/hawaii_gov_lingle_answers_the.html

    And here is the statement of a witness who recalls being told of Obama’s birth in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, in 1961:

    http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/article137495.ece

    Here are the birth notices of Obama’s birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.

    http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabirth.php

    • Thank you Ellen for taking the time to post these links. You have given us a wide range of sites to visit and I appreciate you doing this.

      By the way, what are your thoughts about the many other hidden or sealed records posted on this Article?

    • That is impressive ehancock.
      SSN ?
      School records ?
      Passports ?
      Why have his records been sealed ?
      ….tick tock tick……

  12. Re: “other hidden or sealed records posted on this Article? ”

    If you are referring to school transcripts, college transcripts, passport records, etc, there is no law that says that a president or a presidential candidate must release them. And, guess what, NONE of the Republicans have released their transcripts or passports. They have not even released their birth certificates (Obama however has released his).

    These documents, both those of the Republicans and Obama, are not sealed. They are simply private, under privacy laws that date back for decades. Obama and the Republicans have the right to release those records or not. So far neither Obama nor the Republicans have chosen to do so. However, if the Republican candidate does release, it is likely that Obama will do so too.

  13. Re two on your list:

    3) Obama’s baptism records — sealed
    4) Obama’s adoption records — sealed

    Most likely Obama was never baptized. There is no requirement that he be baptized. Some religions do not even do it.

    Since Obama was never adopted, there are no adoption records. IF he had been adopted, there would be adoption records. Yes he used his stepfather’s name when he was in Indonesia, but there is no evidence t hat he was adopted.

    • If I were you, I would get on the meds, or, off of them, which ever applies.
      The very fact that Obama has sealed his records shows that he is hiding something.
      The fact that he has been aided and abetted in doing so with he help of the 2008 democratic congress is equally suspicious.
      Common sense is a valuable asset.
      Perhaps you should aspire to attain some.

  14. ellenhancock

    Re: “The very fact that Obama has sealed his records shows that he is hiding something.”

    Ah, but he didn’t. The “sealed” story is another birther myth. Obama never sealed anything. His transcripts, medical records, passports, etc are simply private. That is all.

    The allegation that he signed an executive order that sealed these documents is another birther creation. The executive order makes it harder, not easier, for a president to seal records than under a similar executive order by George Bush. And the order does not apply to anything other than FEDERAL records of presidents and former presidents. Not to school transcripts, medical records, corporate records, law records, passports, Etc.–which, as I said were always private. In fact, none of the Republican candidates for president have released such records.

    • Wherefore, this writer believes he has shown reasonable grounds to believe that Barack Hussein Obama has deliberately, unreasonably and with guile concealed nearly all records of his personal documented history from public scrutiny; and that requests to view those records are reasonable, rational and within the American People’s province. This writer believes the People of The United States have a right and responsibility to demand that all of the a fore-described sealed records be released in order that the electorate may examine them to finally determine who Barack Hussein Obama really is, and whence he came.

  15. ellenhancock

    Re: “Wherefore, this writer believes…”

    “This writer”, however, has not discussed the facts. Since “this writer” has not discussed the facts we do not know what the belief is based on.

    The Republican candidates for president have not shown their birth certificates, college grades, passports etc, and yet “this writer” is not worried. “This writer” thinks that Obama concealed records, and yet “this writer” has not show that Obama did anything different than the Republican candidates, which was simply not to release certain records.

    Both the Republicans and Obama have the right to release those records, if they want to, but they also have the right to decide whether or not to do so, and if so when to do so.

    • As much as I would like to continue this debate with you Ellen I really don’t have the time to play your mindless Head Games. You are so far off from the real facts and reality that I think it futile to continue with this debate.

  16. Re: “You are so far off from the real facts and reality that I think it futile to continue with this debate.”

    The record shows that I discussed the facts, and I did not call names. I only discussed the facts.

    If you feel that you cannot answer, that is fine. But it is clear that you cannot answer the facts. That is the reason you cannot answer.

    • Ellen, just think logically for a moment. There just shouldn’t be this many unanswered questions about our president’s past. Any other presidential candidate is thoroughly vetted, down to the gnat’s a**. Yet, we know little to nothing about this president. That doesn’t strike you the least bit odd? Not in the slightest? This is the leader of our country. We should know exactly who we are electing. I think you should really think about that. Where there’s smoke, there’s fire. There are just way too many things that don’t add up about this guy. Wake up and smell the fraud. You’ve been duped.

      • Good Morning Right Hook and thank you for this. It is near impossible to get a Liberal to consider another point of view on anything.

  17. The issue isn’t whether he was born in HI its that he’s not a natural born citizen, never was, never will be! I have been watching this guy operate for 5 years now! I now believe the whole BC issue was just a smoke screen to damage the messengers, and that quite possibly the one he showed in August is a forgery, but that there really is a valid one in HI! I believe the bigger issue is all the other fraudulent acts committed! Identity theft of a SS #, Selective Service fraud, passport records, probably securing funds to attend schools under fraudulent circumstances! Perhaps even a criminal record! The issue is clearly about NOT BEING A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, the BC IS A DISTRACTION! The scrubbing of citations and all references to the SCOTUS decision defining what a NBC is, Minor vs Happersett was very telling for me! 8 Congressional attempts to change Article 2, section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution, unsuccessful I might add, and the fact that Nancy PELOSI signed two separate certifications to place Obama on the ballot in all 50 states did it for me!

    • Good Morning Rayne and thank you for this insightful information. Please do feel free to join with us as we attempt to expose this President for what he really is…… a Fraud

  18. Righthook was much more diplomatic than I’d have been. He has it to a tee. The Constitution demands that BOTH PARENTS BE U.S. CITIZENS. Period. Not Negotiable. His Father Was A British subject, since Kenya at the time was a British protectorate. END OF DISCUSSION.

  19. Pingback: FBI Witness Murdered Who Had Access & Was To Testify In Obama/Soetoro Passport FBI Investigation. | Political Vel Craft

  20. Thank you Political Vel Craft for the link back my friends ;)

  21. Pingback: The Legend Of Barry Soetoro As Barack Hussein Obama II | Political Vel Craft

  22. Thank you for the link back Political Vel Craft ;)

  23. Re: “The Constitution demands that BOTH PARENTS BE U.S. CITIZENS. Period. Not Negotiable.”

    Who told you that? It is wrong. The meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the British common law and refers to the PLACE of birth, not the parents.

    Here is an actual example of how Natural Born Citizen was used in America (not Switzerland) in 1803, shortly after the Constitution went into effect:

    “Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. …St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE’S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)

    As you can see, that refers only to the place of birth. Natural Born Citizens were “those born within a state.”

    And here is how it was used in 1829:

    “Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity.”—William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)

    And here is how Edwin Meese, Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, used it in a book a few years ago:

    “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President….”—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

    And here is what one of three state court cases and a federal court case ruled specifically on this matter:

    “Based on the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural born-born subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [ ] natural-born citizens.”— Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, 916 NE2d 678, 688 (2009), (Ind.Supreme Court, Apr. 5, 2010)

    In addition to Indiana, courts in Georgia and Arizona ruled the same thing, as did this federal court. http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=21346

    And federal courts have been ruling that the US-born children of foreigners are Natural Born Citizens for years. For example:

    Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice, 179 F.3d 1017 (6th Cir. 1999) (children born in US to two Romanian citizens described as “natural born citizens” of the US):

    “Petitioners Marian and Lenuta Mustata are citizens of Romania. At the time of their petition, they resided in Michigan with their two minor children, who are natural born citizens of the United States.”

    • Ellen, again you’re ignoring all the evidence against this guy. There are just too many things that don’t add up. You’re putting all of this focus on trying to prove us wrong on one thing, but try explaining all of it away. You can’t. The man has no respect for this country or our troops. He apologizes to the enemy, but doesn’t care about the loss of OUR soldiers. What American president has ever acted in such a way??? THIS is the person you want to represent us????? He doesn’t speak for us, that’s for sure, and we want him out. You’re wasting your time here.

    • You are deliberately muddying the waters, if you want to argue law provide the real deal and not something that you have warped and twisted in order to fit what you want it to fit. From Leo Donofrio, Esq.
      “Any genuine construction of the “natural born Citizen” clause must begin from the starting point that it requires something more than citizenship by virtue of being born on U.S. soil. Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), tells you exactly what that something is; citizen parents.”
      Two extremely relevant posts: The Dirty “little” Secret Of The Natural Born Citizen Clause Revealed.
      The Current INS Officially Recognizes A Delineation Between Natural-Born and Native-Born. http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
      If you have an honest argument, provide it with law based in the US on precedents already decided by the Supreme Court that are relevant. Otherwise, why don’t you quit wasting Sami’s valuable time with nonsense.

  24. Re: “The man has no respect for this country or our troops. He apologizes to the enemy, but doesn’t care about the loss of OUR soldiers. ”

    A lot of other people feel like you. The solution is to vote against Obama. However, he was born in the USA, and hence he is a Natural Born US Citizen.

    Re: “Leo Donofrio, Esq.” and about two other birther lawyers have CLAIMED that Minor vs Happersett said that two citizen parents are required. BUT they did not explain the concept of “dicta” to you, did they? (It means that a statement about another subject in a case about one subject is not part of the ruling.) And the Minor vs Happersett case was a voting rights case. More importantly, the Minor vs Happersett case says right in it that IT DOES NOT HAVE TO DECIDE. Leo and other other birther lawyers cut off that sentence. They just ignore it. Yet the statement that the court does not have to decide shows of course that IT DID NOT DECIDE.

    And finally, the Wong Kim Ark ruling was AFTER the Minor vs Happersett ruling. So the ruling in Wong Kim Ark would have overturned Minor vs Happersett (if Minor actually was a ruling, which it wasn’t). And the Wong Kim Ark case stated quite clearly that EVERY CHILD born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is NATURAL BORN.

    THREE birther lawyers have said that Minor vs Happersett said two citizen parents. There are about 400 lawyers in Congress and another 400 in the US Electoral College. Birthers and two-fers tried to get them to vote against Obama, but not a member of the Electoral College change a vote, and not one member of Congress voted against Obama’s nomination. IF Minor vs Happersett had really said what Leo said, there would certainly have been at least one member in the 800 or so lawyers who voted against Obama or changed her or his vote.

    Leo and other birther lawyers are pulling our chain. It ain’t true what they say.

    Further research:

    http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/03/arizona-court-declares-john-woodman-correct-lawyers-mario-apuzzo-and-leo-donofrio-completely-wrong-on-what-makes-a-natural-born-citizen/

    and: http://birtherthinktank.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/allen-order-dismissing-complaint.pdf

    (NOTICE the sentence: “Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor vs Happersett does not rule otherwise.”

    Still other research:

    htp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause_of_the_U.S._Constitution

    http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/scotus-natural-born-citizen-a-compendium.html

    http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/the-natural-born-citizenship-clause-updated.html

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/bookmarks/fact-checking-and-debunking/the-debunkers-guide-to-obama-conspiracy-theories/#nbc

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/01/natural-born-citizenship-for-dummies/

    http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/02/an-open-letter-to-mario-apuzzo/

    http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=21346

    • Ellen, the jury is still out on the “Birther” issue with us as a group.

      Obama’s Citizenship is an important issue to say the least and is only questioned by us as he has been allusive on this issue with the exception of his once provided “Copy” of a long form Birth Certificate.

      Now, lets get beyond this unresolvable issue and address the other concerns which you seem hell bent on ignoring.

      His Social Security and passport issues?
      His College transcripts?
      His Radical associations?
      His Senate Record?
      His Adoption Records?
      His Travel Records?
      His and Michelle Disbarment from Law Practice records?

      This Article is about “all” of these issues and few more I have not mentioned in this response to you!

      We would like you to actually respond to some of “These” questions if you wish to continue on in debating here.

      Who is this International Man of Mystery?

      First President to refuse to show a valid birth certificate.
      First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.
      First President to preside over a cut to the credit rating of the United States .
      First President to violate the War Powers Act.
      First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico .
      First President to defy a Federal Judges court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law.
      First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.
      First President to spend a trillion dollars on shovel-ready jobs and later admit there was no such thing as shovel-ready jobs.
      First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.
      First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.
      First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.
      First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.
      First President to terminate Americas ability to put a man in space.
      First President to encourage racial discrimination and intimidation at polling places.
      First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.
      First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.
      First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly speak-out on the reasons for their rate increases.
      First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state they are allowed to locate a factory.
      First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN)
      First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.
      First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.
      First President to appoint 45 Czars to replace elected officials in his office.
      First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office.
      First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records.
      First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.
      First President to coddle American enemies while alienating Americas allies.
      First President to publicly bow to Americas enemies while refusing to salute the U.S. Flag.
      First President to go on multiple global apology tours.
      First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends, paid for by the taxpayer.
      First President to refuse to wear the U.S. Flag lapel pin.
      First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.
      First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000.00 a year at taxpayer expense.
      First President to repeat ‘the Holy Qur’an tells us’, and openly admit the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.

    • Must I repeat all the accusations on this Article?

      I guess so!

      I culled from John’s affadavit what is undoubtedly an incomplete list of the Obama documents that we, the people, have just never gotten a look at due to Obama’s decision not to let us look.

      Sure, there’s (1) the original, long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate.

      Then there’s:

      2) Marriage license between Obama’s father (Barak Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham) — not found, not released
      3) Obama’s baptism records — sealed
      4) Obama’s adoption records — sealed
      5) Records of Obama’s and his mother’s reptriation as US citizens on return from Indonesia — not found, not released
      6) Name change (Barry Sotero to Barack Hussein Obama) records — not found, not released
      7) Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) — not released
      8) Punahou School financial aid or school records — not released
      9) Occidental College financial aid records — not released. (These records were, however, subpoenaed but Obama lawyers succeeded in quashing the subpoena in court. No other Occi records have been released.)
      10) Columbia College records — not released
      11) Columbia senior thesis — not released
      12) Harvard Law School records (not mentioned below, but not released)
      13) Obama’s law client list — sealed
      14) Obama’s files from career as an Illinois State Senator — sealed
      15) Obama’s record with Illinois State Bar Association — sealed
      16) Obama’s medical records — not released
      17) Obama’s passport records — not released

      That’s a lot of records sealed and not released. But there’s much more to “the case.” Read it and see what you as an American citizen think.

      The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama

      The writer, John L. Work, a retired commissioned Colorado Peace Officer and a citizen of the United States of America, herein presents the following facts and circumstances regarding The President of The United States, Barack Hussein Obama. This writer states to this Honorable Court of Public Opinion that Barack Hussein Obama has failed to truthfully disclose to the American People a substantial amount of documentary evidence about his origins and history, to wit:

      Barack Hussein Obama, AKA Barry Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, AKA Barry Dunham, DOB 8-4-1961, the duly elected and sworn President of The United States of America, has not proven that he is Constitutionally eligible to hold that Office. The reasons this writer believes this to be true are as follows:

      Former Pennsylvania Deputy Attorney General Phillip Berg states in a lawsuit filed in 2008 that Obama’s father, Barack Obama, Sr., was at the time of Barack, Jr.’s birth a British subject of Kenya, Africa.

      Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (DOB 11-29-1942), was not old enough to legally confer American citizenship on Barack, Jr. at his birth.

      Affidavits sworn to and signed by Rev. Kweli Shuhubia and Bishop Ron McRae say that Obama’s paternal grandmother, Sarah Obama, stated during an interview conducted in both the Swahili and English languages that she was present at Barack Obama, Jr.’s birth in Mombasa, Kenya.

      Publication of Hawaiian newspaper birth announcements in 1961 did not necessarily constitute proof that a birth actually occurred within the State and offer no legal substantiation of citizenship in and of themselves; further, during 1961 Hawaii’s law allowed issuance of Hawaiian birth certification for babies born outside the United States

      In his book “Dreams from My Father” Obama claims that, following his birth, his married parents lived together in Hawaii until 1962. Jerome Corsi (Ph.D. Harvard University), an internationally recognized scholar, author and investigative reporter, has discovered documentary evidence which shows that in fact Stanley Ann Dunham and her new-born son Barack, Jr., moved to Seattle, Washington within two weeks of his birth; and that Stanley Ann started Fall semester classes there as a university student.

      Jerome Corsi has been unable to locate any recorded evidence in Hawaii of either a marriage between Barack, Sr. and Stanley Dunham, or that they ever lived together.

      Aaron Klein, author of The Manchurian President, reported in the October 27, 2009 World Net Daily that Obama’s wife, Michelle Obama, publicly stated that Stanley Ann Dunham was single when she had Barack, Jr.

      The Maui News published a report on January 21, 2009, in which former teachers Aimee Yatsushiro and Katherine Nakamoto said that Obama attended Noelani Elementary School from 1966 to 1967. No records from the school have been released.

      Circa 1967 Stanley Ann Dunham married an Indonesian Muslim named Lolo Soetoro (DOB circa 1935).

      The Soetoros lived in Jakarta, Indonesia where Barack, Jr. attended Franciskus Assissi school under the name Barry Soetoro, registered as a Muslim. He later attended an Indonesian public school.

      Stanley Soetoro divorced Lolo in 1980. No records of either Stanley Ann’s or Barry Soetoro’s repatriation as citizens of the United States from Indonesia have been released. No name change records have been released.

      A report published by Chelsea Schilling on 6-9-2009 in World Net Daily says: a) that Obama attended Punahou School in Honolulu on a scholarship from 5th through 12th grades, and graduated in 1979. b) that none of Obama’s Punahou school financial records have been released.

      Schilling’s report further states: a) that Obama attended Occidental College in Los Angeles from 1979 to 1981. b) that attorney Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice Foundation served a subpoena on the College for Obama’s financial and scholarship records in order to determine if Obama, who was studying on a scholarship, attended Occidental as a foreign national. c) that attorneys for Obama intervened and got the subpoena quashed in Court. d) that none of Obama’s Occidental financial records have been released.

      Schilling’s report also states: a) In 1982 Obama transferred from Occidental to Columbia University in NYC. b) that while he claims to have been active in the Black Student Organization, no one among a number of prominent student leaders interviewed by the New York Times recalled Obama being there. c) that Fox News contacted 400 Columbia students from that time period – and not one of them remembered him. d) that Obama graduated from Columbia in 1983, but school officials claim they do not have a copy of his senior thesis. e) that Obama has refused to release his Columbia transcripts.

      Schilling’s report further states that Obama entered Harvard University Law School, graduated in 1991 and that he served as the Editor of The Harvard Law Review.

      Schilling’s report also says: a) that Obama has not released his medical records. b) that Obama’s passport records have never been released c) that Obama at one point in his life traveled to Pakistan, using a passport of unknown origin d) that all files from Obama’s years as an Illinois State Senator are sealed. e) that Obama’s law client list is sealed. f) that Obama’s records with the Illinois State Bar Association are sealed. g) that Obama’s baptism records are sealed. h) that Obama’s adoption records are sealed.

      An AP report published on 6-27-2004 in the Sunday Standard online edition states that Obama was born in Kenya.

      Mayhill Fowler reported in the April 7, 2008 Huffington Post on an Obama April 6, 2008 fundraiser speech, during which Obama claimed to have traveled to Pakistan when he was in college. On 4-18-2010 this writer followed Mayhill’s link to an audio-recording of the speech and found that it has been removed from the site.

      Jerome Corsi reported in World Net Daily on 10-26-2008 that Obama’s original long-form birth certificate is sealed by Hawaii’s Governor, Linda Lingle.

      On 11-13-2008, attorney at law and author Debbie Schlussel published a copyrighted report of an investigation she commissioned to be done by retired ICE Agent Stephen Coffman into Obama’s Selective Service registration documents. Coffman’s evidentiary findings led to Schlussel’s conclusion that Barack Obama “…either didn’t register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently…”

      On 8-10-2009 Hawaii Department of Health spokesperson Janet Okubo refused to verify the authenticity of an image, generated by computer and released to the press corps by Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt. LaBolt said that the image depicted was Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Okubo also refused to confirm the veracity of a second and different online computer-generated Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth, posted by FactCheck.org.

      On October 1, 2009, Susan Daniels, a citizen of the State of Ohio and a licensed private investigator for the plaintiffs in United States District Court Case SACV09-00082-DOC (Anx), Captain Pamela Barnett et al v. Defendants Barack Hussein Obama, Michelle L. R. Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M. Gates, and Joseph R. Biden, filed an affidavit with the Court. Daniels’ affidavit states that she has found evidence proving that Barack Obama’s Social Security Number was issued by the State of Connecticut between 1977 and 1979; further, that Obama’s Social Security Number appears to be originally associated with a man who was born in the 1890s and is now deceased.

      Susan Daniels filed a second affidavit with the Court on October 19, 2009, which says that further investigation uncovered eight different Social Security Numbers for Barack Hussein Obama in addition to the number to which she alluded in her first affidavit, and two different Social Security Numbers for Michelle Obama.

      This writer states to this Honorable Court of Public Opinion that there is no known evidence of record to this date which shows that Barack Hussein Obama ever lived in Connecticut.

      Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution of The United States of America mandates that “…No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States…”

      Wherefore, this writer believes he has shown reasonable grounds to believe that Barack Hussein Obama has deliberately, unreasonably and with guile concealed nearly all records of his personal documented history from public scrutiny; and that requests to view those records are reasonable, rational and within the American People’s province. This writer believes the People of The United States have a right and responsibility to demand that all of the afore-described sealed records be released in order that the electorate may examine them to finally determine who Barack Hussein Obama really is, and whence he came.

    • Oh don’t worry. We have every intention on voting the man out, birth certificate or not. You’re obsessing on this birth certificate issue. We’re just putting the questions out there….you’re droning on and on about it, while ignoring the other facts. Is this the only argument you have to defend the man? Honestly, your posts are exhausting….it’s nothing more than drivel. This is just one in a growing list of inconsistencies. Wake uuuuup, Ellen…..

      Do you know Obama just signed a bill into law (in secret, I might add), that makes it a FELONY to protest when the Secret Services is around? Get that? A felony, that can result in a year of more of prison time, just for exercising your 1st amendment rights in the vicinity of the president, or anyone else who is being protected by the SS. This means he could assign SS to David Axelrod or anyone else in his campaign, or for any one of his un-Constitutional czars, and you could be arrested and send to prison for protesting them in any way, even just holding a sign. That is in direct violation of our Constitution. We’re losing our rights every day, and you’re only worried about proving his innocence on the stupid birth certificate.

  25. All your other points about Obama being a bad president are your opinion and you are entitled to it, and you can vote the way that you feel.

    I was simply concentrating on the lie about his birth certificate not being valid, and the lie about his having been born outside of Hawaii, and the lie that he “hid” records–when the Republican candidates for president did not show those records either.

    Obama has shown his birth certificate from Hawaii, and three Republican (and several Democrat) officials in Hawaii have confirmed the facts on it. They are further confirmed by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961–which were only sent to the papers by the DOH at the time (Hawaii papers did not accept birth notices from any other source at the time), and the DOH did not send out birth notices for births outside of Hawaii.

    • ellen,…If you went to a potential employer and refused to give the employer a valid resume, do you think the employer should hire you ?
      If you did submit the required paperwork and it was found to be falsified, do you think the employer should hire you then ?
      Obama did not apply to a widget factory, he applied for the job of the President of the United States of America, and the ‘employer’ (congress) did not vet him properly.
      If congress did not know of the questions concerning his history, they should have pursued the potential compromise of our National Security.
      Instead, they vetted him, and allowed him to run.

      Why did he lock up his records as the first executive order he signed after taking office ?
      What is he hiding, and why ?

    • The republican candidates DID show their records.
      You are assuming that John McCain’s records were not available to the public ?
      He served in the Navy !
      Obama’s Selective Service Card (draft card) has also been declared a forgery.

    • Again you are using excuses for not addressing the many other issues concerning Obama that are ever so relevant to his holding the office of President.

      Calling us Liars for posing these questions will not be tolerated here on my blogs by you or any other “Intolerant” Liberals that come this way.

      You are living your life in denial of truth my friend and are unwilling to even consider the possibilities of Obama’s many deceptions.

      Liberals are always touting “Reason” and yet are consistently “Unreasonable” when it comes to any questioning of their Liberal Ideologies per say.

      Shame on you for your shallow plain of sight on those most important issues facing all of us Americans in this day.

    • Ok, Ellen, in all seriousness, I’d love to hear your take on all of these other issues. We know where you stand on the birth certificate, and we could go around on this one forever, but we’re clearly not getting anywhere. So why don’t you share your opinions on the other issues at hand. I can’t really get any liberals to give a strong defense on these items. What in your opinion, has Obama accomplished during his term, that warrants him a 2nd term? And please don’t give hypotheticals, like he kept us from an even bigger recession or depression, or “it could be much worse”. What has he done to deserve a 2nd term in office?

  26. Pingback: Wayne Madsen: Obama’s CIA Connections, Part I and II | Veterans Today « ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+. ~ (BLOG & EMAIL)

  27. Re: “hat in your opinion, has Obama accomplished during his term, that warrants him a 2nd term?”

    This is a perfectly valid question, and each of us must answer it before going into the voting booth. Another question, of course, is whether or not the Republican candidate is better than Obama. Many people will hold that the Republican is better. That is their right.

    But it is too early to discuss this since we do not know who the Republican candidate will be, or his detailed position on all the issues.

    What is perfectly clear right now is that Obama was born in Hawaii, as has been proven overwhelmingly, and that he–along with about 300 million other US citizens who were born on US soil–is a Natural Born Citizen due to his place of birth.

    Re: “The republican candidates DID show their records.
    You are assuming that John McCain’s records were not available to the public ?”

    Answer: Have you seen McCain’s college transcript? You may have seen a McCain “birth certificate” online, but it is not his—it was forged by an enemy of McCain’s. McCain never showed his birth certificate, nor did Bush or Clinton or any other president (except perhaps Eisenhower). And None of the Republican candidates for president has shown their college transcripts or their birth certificate.

    Re: “Affidavits sworn to and signed by Rev. Kweli Shuhubia and Bishop Ron McRae say that Obama’s paternal grandmother, Sarah Obama, stated during an interview conducted in both the Swahili and English languages that she was present at Barack Obama, Jr.’s birth in Mombasa, Kenya.”

    Answer: However, the transcript of the interview shows that she did NOT say it, and that in fact she said repeatedly that Obama was born in Hawaii. And, she said in another interview (Hartford Courant newspaper) that the first that her family had heard of Obama’s birth was IN A LETTER FROM HAWAII.

    Want me to post the transcript?

    For those of you who still believe that Obama could have been born in Kenya–or anywhere outside of the USA for that matter—a question for you.

    For those of you who still believe that Obama could have been born somewhere else than in Hawaii, a question for you:

    I’ll bet that you know (but, actually, you may have forgotten) that the US government requires, and has long required, that a child being carried into the USA must have some kind of official travel document to be admitted. This is usually a US passport for the child. Or, it could be the fact that the child is entered on the mother’s US passport. Or, it could be a US visa for the child on a foreign passport. Without one of those, we would not let the child into the country.

    So, IF Obama really had been born in Kenya (or in any country other than the USA), he would have had to have one of those documents–wouldn’t he? His family would have had to show the passport, wouldn’t they? To show the passport, they would have had to have applied for the passport or the visa for Obama. And, if Obama really were born in Kenya (or another country), they would have had to have applied for it in the US consulate or embassy there, wouldn’t they?

    Such applications are FILED by the US government. The documents exist in multiple files, the actual application itself, communication about it with Washington, entries in the passport file, entries in the application file, entries in the places where the child is carried into the USA. The Bush Administration was in charge of the State Department and the INS for eight years before Obama was elected. Don’t you think that they would have checked the claim that he was born outside the USA?

    All they had to do was find one of those files and McCain would win the election.

    Well, they never did. There is no such file.

    So the question is, do you think that the Bush Administration was part of the plot?

    Do you think that the files, the documents, the application for the documents, the communications about the documents were all lost or hidden? Remember, they are in multiple files, the file of the passport holder, the files of applications for passports, the files in the US embassy in foreign countries, the files in the State Department and in the INS (which would have checked in Obama at an entry point if he had actually traveled in 1961)–and yet no document has been found. Why not?

    The absence of the travel document, plus the Hawaii birth certificate, plus the confirmation of the facts on it by three Republican (and several Democrat) officials, plus the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, plus the witness who remembers being told of the birth and writing home about it (to her father, named Stanley, about the unusual event of a birth to a woman named Stanley). All this is evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii.

    The “affidavits” are based on lies, just like the lies of the people who claimed to have gone to Kenya and gotten “Kenyan birth certificates” there, but who refused to prove that they had even gone to Kenya and who used USA date formats, not the British formats used in Kenya. Oh and the elections clerk who said that “everyone knew’ that there was not a birth certificate (but if “everyone knew” you’d think that at least one of them would have confirmed his statement by now), and it turns out that the members of the Election Commission did not have access to birth certificate records.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthers

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012

    http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors

    Re: “If you went to a potential employer and refused to give the employer a valid resume, do you think the employer should hire you ?”

    But in fact we did hire him. We elected him president. Of course, he had already shown his birth certificate, the short form–which is the official birth certificate. And, perhaps you have not noticed, but none of the Republican candidates for president has show his birth certificate yet.

    • It appears Ellen that you are clueless to the countless requests from this blog on the other issues and like a one track minded liberal continue on with your insistence of Barry’s Birth Certificate.

      I think you would be better served by frequenting the Liberal Blogs where you might find some individuals who would be interested in what you have to say.

      We are not any longer and you my friend have worn out your welcome here with your long drawn out Comments and Liberal Dribble.

    • Ellen, we’re done here. You’ve refused to address any other issues, and are on “rinse and repeat” with this birth certificate crap. I refuse to debate you any further, since you can bring nothing more to the table. Good luck to you.

    • As I read the curiosities of folks concerning Obama’s actions I am continually amazed at the surprise
      and horror that folks arrive at for their observations.

      Didn’t you all know the direction of Obama as he said them before he was elected?
      Did you not realize his thinking hinged on the fact that he didn’t think that the constitution favored the power of the
      federal government enough? You didn’t know that fact?

      He said clearly he thought the constitutions protection of individual liberty was in need of change that sided towards government authority.
      Why do you suppose he wanted these changes? Well that is simple enough, he wanted more power for wealth redistribution.
      What did you think that meant?

      What you don’t clearly see for what is coming is the removal of liberty from individuals by taking power in the machinery of the federal government
      moves us closer to a one world governance. Doesn’t this make sense?
      When you see our wealth going to third world nations don’t you realize that our control is lowered while the third world nation is elevated?
      When you see a diminishing of or military does it occur to you that it becomes easier for us to be subjugated to others’ will?
      Oh wait I see why it is you haven’t come to know this: You digest what the media wants you to know.
      Don’t you realize that the media who sold us Obama is interested in broadcasting to more viewers. If they go from a national broadcasting position to an international position what happens? More ratings and more money! Obama would love for nothing more than to deliver the authority of te US Government to a Global Authority where he and his cronies could control the world.

      None of this makes sense to you? Why does the Obama Administration want to undo, both the first and second amendments of the constitution?
      He wants to get rid of God and Guns… Isn’t that clear? Without God’s authority he becomes God. Without guns nobody stands in his way.
      Did Americans go to sleep one night and wake up critically thinking challenged? When did it become a good idea to participate in something like #OWS. Those desiring what Obama intended to do are clearly dangerous people because of their weak-minded manner of understanding the responsibility of freedom.

      Who in their right mind thinks Obama has any clue as how to meet a payroll? Since when did a community organizer understand and master the intricacies of profitable investing? Since when did a non practicing lawyer ever be a good choice for a capital defense argument.
      Most folks who wanted Obama, wanted him because they didn’t use their critical thinking apparatus. What they did use is their desire function or emotive need.

      I have no time for folks that demand fairness in governance. I value equal opportunity, not affirmative action.
      If you are surprised at what Obama has been doing, then maybe the problem isn’t Obama. He has done all he said he was going to do.
      Maybe the problem is you and your habits of listening to the whores in media that want greater profits worldwide for selling you the biggest package
      of nonsense sold since the days of the wonder lotions pimped in the old days of western frontier days.

      I knew what Obama was all about and he hasn’t surprised me one bit. Self proclaimed smart Americans have surprised me though. I don’t consider anyone to be smart who sided with Utopian thinking or the motivations of Obama. But you keep living in the Folly of Hypocronance.

  28. Thank you for the link back Gunny G ;)

  29. Pingback: ‘The Road We’ve Traveled:’ A misleading account of Obama’s mother and her insurance dispute « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  30. Thank you for the link back Gunny G.

  31. Pingback: Passport Witness To Testify Against Obama ~ Fatally Shot Outside Church! | Political Vel Craft

  32. Thank you for the link back Political Vel Craft

  33. Pingback: - Prepper Podcast Radio Network News

  34. Thank you for the link back my friends at Prepper Podcast Radio Network News

  35. Pingback: Anybody But Obama 2012 [Infographic] – John Malcolm

  36. Thank you for the link back John Malcolm

  37. Pingback: Constitutional Elections Conference: Carl Gallups speaks on Obama’s Eligibility Fraud (Running Time 59:40) [Video] – John Malcolm

  38. Thank you for the link back John

  39. Pingback: Breaking => Obama’s Sister Maya Soetoro’s Long Form Vault Birth Certificate From Indonesia, Has Hawaii COLB Just Like Barack. « Political Vel Craft

  40. Pingback: Voting American Resource Center Presents………. Fact Checking Barack Obama with 580 Links | Voting American