Category Archives: DRD4

Imprisoned in a Liberal Utopia

64227_10151541833071069_678362571_n

The Depravity of Liberalism, an Ideology of Hate and Violence

Hollywood gives us all the spectrum of a depraved lifestyle as we watch daily on the news the events in the lives of those who have found fame and fortune in a world gone mad. A culture of people who have it all and yet are never satisfied and are always craving more.  Alcohol, Drugs, Sex, and sometimes violence seem to fill in the blanks of this Liberal Lifestyle in an endless array of headlines that expose these so called Role Models of our Society.  Perhaps this has spilled over into the main stream liberal society as we watch the drama of the Liberal Movement in America. 

A true Culture of Hate and Violence is emerging on the American Scene and thanks to Video phones we are seeing first hand the true nature of the Liberal Agenda.

roots-of-evil

Could this be the Cause?

DRD4 Liberal Genetic Code

Scientists Find ‘Liberal Gene’

liberal-brain

Researchers have determined that genetics could matter when it comes to some adults’ political leanings.

According to scientists at UC San Diego and Harvard University, “ideology is affected not just by social factors, but also by a dopamine receptor gene called DRD4.” That and how many friends you had during high school.

The study was led by UCSD’s James Fowler and focused on 2,000 subjects from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Scientists matched the subjects’ genetic information with “maps” of their social networks. According to researchers, they determined that people “with a specific variant of the DRD4 gene were more likely to be liberal as adults.” However, the, subjects were only more likely to have leanings to the left if they were also socially active during adolescence.

“It is the crucial interaction of two factors — the genetic predisposition and the environmental condition of having many friends in adolescence — that is associated with being more liberal,” according to the study.

ANY QUESTIONS?

drugged-killers40

 

America Cannot Afford nor Survive Four More Years of the Barack Obama Agenda!

We have had enough of President Obama’s Blatant Lies and Misrepresentations of the Facts. It is time for our Elected Officials and Media to call this President out on the carpet and expose his True Agenda for what it really is.

Socialism

The American People are not stupid Mr. President and we proved that on November 2nd 2010.  Do you really think we are going to allow this to continue unchecked?

Your brand of Liberalism and Socialism is all but over in these United States and We the People are going to ensure you never see a Second Term as our President.

No Miranda Rights and No Trial for Osama said Obama

So whatever happened to the Liberal Ideology against the Death Penalty and Assassinations?

Where is the Screaming Outrage from the Liberals and the Media?

Imagine if George W. Bush had ordered the Assassination of Osama Bin Laden? You know, the War Mongering President Bush. What would have been the Media Response?

Imagine if George W. Bush had ordered the attack on Libya?   What would have been the Media Response? 

I wonder why our New Warrior President has not ordered Military Action against Syria?  Seems they are doing the same things Libya is doing.

Kinda makes you go Hmmm, doesn’t it?

If George W. Bush had doubled the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had criticized a state law that he admitted he never even read would you think that he is just an ignorant hot head?

If George W. Bush joined the country of Mexico and sued a state in the United States to force that state to continue to allow illegal immigration, would you question his patriotism and wonder whose side he was on?

If George W. Bush had put 87000 workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling on companies that have one of the best safety records of any industry because one company had an accident would you have agreed?

If George W. Bush had used a forged document as the basis of the moratorium that would render 87000 American workers unemployed would you support him?

If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a TelePrompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?

If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?

If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent “Austrian language,” would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United States , would you have said that he is clueless.

If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in Texas , would you have thought he was a self important, conceited, egotistical jerk?

If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?

If George W. Bush had misspelled the word “advice” would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoes as proof of what a dunce he is?

If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite?

If George W. Bush’s administration had OK’d Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?

If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?

If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America, would you have approved.

If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?

So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can’t think of anything? Don’t worry. He’s done all this in less than two and a half years so you’ll have another two years to come up with an answer.

http://votingamerican.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/was-george-w-bush-a-complete-idiot-or-what/

Just something to think about is all

The Fundamental Transformation of America is Here

How’s this for Hope and Change

While all of America is distracted and focused on the death of Osama bin Laden, our President has been fast at work laying the groundwork for S. 679:

Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011 to speed through the Senate and then make its way into the House and then to the President to sign.

Brought to you by your Democratically Controlled Senate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In modern usage, the term “dictator” is generally used to describe a leader who holds and/or abuses an extraordinary amount of personal power, especially the power to make laws without effective restraint by a legislative assembly[citation needed]. Dictatorships are often characterized by some of the following traits: suspension of elections and of civil liberties; proclamation of a state of emergency; rule by decree; repression of political opponents without abiding by rule of law procedures; these include single-party state, and cult of personality.[citation needed]

On March 30, 2011, Senator Charles Schumer (D–NY) with 15 cosponsors, including the Senate Majority and Republican Leaders, as well as six other Democratic Senators, six other Republican Senators, and an Independent Senator,[1] introduced in the Senate the Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011 (S. 679). The bill was referred to the

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

The Heritage Foundation

The bill reduces the number of presidential appointments that require the consent of the Senate and establishes within the executive branch a Working Group on Streamlining Paperwork for Executive Nominations. Individuals nominated to senior executive offices suffer slow and detailed background investigations and mounds of duplicative paperwork before a President sends their nominations to the Senate. After nomination, many nominees suffer time-consuming inaction or time-consuming and excruciating action as the Senate proceeds (or does not) with consideration of the nomination. The sponsors of S. 679 have identified a valid problem, but proposed the wrong solution. Congress should not enact S. 679.

When the delegates of the states gathered in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 and wrote the Constitution, they distributed the powers of the federal government among two Houses of Congress, a President, and a judiciary, and required in many cases that two of them work together to exercise a particular constitutional power. That separation of powers protects the liberties of the American people by preventing any one officer of the government from aggregating too much power.

The Framers of the Constitution did not give the President the kingly power to appoint the senior officers of the government by himself. Instead, they allowed the President to name an individual for a senior office, but then required the President to obtain the Senate’s consent before appointing the individual to office. Thus, they required the cooperation of the President and the Senate to put someone in high office.

Read the rest of the Article at…..:The Heritage Foundation

Mr. President,  we are Americans and we will never surrender to your blatant over reach of power against US.  We have fought on foreign shores to preserve our Freedoms and Way of Life and we will fight right here on our own lands to protect and defend those same Freedoms. 

You Sir, are underestimating the Will of the American People.


Senate Bill S679 giving Obama the Power of a Caesar/Dictator

Here it comes as we all knew it would:

B a r a c k a c u s s t u s   C a e s a r

While all of America is distracted and focused on the death of Osama bin Laden, our President has been fast at work laying the groundwork for S. 679:

Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011 to speed through the Senate and then make its way into the House and then to the President to sign.

Brought to you by your Democratically Controlled Senate

From the:  The Heritage Foundation

 The bill reduces the number of presidential appointments that require the consent of the Senate and establishes within the executive branch a Working Group on Streamlining Paperwork for Executive Nominations. Individuals nominated to senior executive offices suffer slow and detailed background investigations and mounds of duplicative paperwork before a President sends their nominations to the Senate. After nomination, many nominees suffer time-consuming inaction or time-consuming and excruciating action as the Senate proceeds (or does not) with consideration of the nomination. The sponsors of S. 679 have identified a valid problem, but proposed the wrong solution. Congress should not enact S. 679.

When the delegates of the states gathered in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 and wrote the Constitution, they distributed the powers of the federal government among two Houses of Congress, a President, and a judiciary, and required in many cases that two of them work together to exercise a particular constitutional power. That separation of powers protects the liberties of the American people by preventing any one officer of the government from aggregating too much power.

The Framers of the Constitution did not give the President the kingly power to appoint the senior officers of the government by himself. Instead, they allowed the President to name an individual for a senior office, but then required the President to obtain the Senate’s consent before appointing the individual to office. Thus, they required the cooperation of the President and the Senate to put someone in high office.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In modern usage, the term “dictator” is generally used to describe a leader who holds and/or abuses an extraordinary amount of personal power, especially the power to make laws without effective restraint by a legislative assembly[citation needed]. Dictatorships are often characterized by some of the following traits: suspension of elections and of civil liberties; proclamation of a state of emergency; rule by decree; repression of political opponents without abiding by rule of law procedures; these include single-party state, and cult of personality.[citation needed]

How’s this for Hope and Change?

If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove your not a Racist your going to have to vote for someone else in 2012 to prove your not an Idiot!

Providing we still have Elections


Will the Liberal Sheep Ban Nuclear Energy?

Are they Beginning to think its…… Baaah’aaad?

One can only imagine what the Green Earth save the Whales Libs will come up with on this one.  I mean, Nuclear Energy was billed as the Clean Energy just a few decades ago but now that it is kinda  blowing up in their faces they are Bleeeping out a new message.  I think maybe they are just waiting for their Shepard, President Obama to weigh in on this issue.

TICK-TOCK…..TICK- TOCK

TICK-TOCK…..TICK- TOCK

TICK-TOCK…..TICK- TOCK

Mr. President, where are you?

TICK-TOCK…..TICK- TOCK

NEVER MIND

The Looney Left finds their Poster Child in Charlie Sheen

Could there be a better Poster Child for the Liberal Left?  I don’t think so! After watching the Liberal Union Thugs  in Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana, New Jersey and throughout the Country this past two weeks I am now convince of the fact that there is some kind of a Mental and Emotional Disconnect being exhibited in these people.  Science backs up my opinion on this with the discovery of the Liberal Gene or DRD4.  It all makes sense, and now I have a much better understanding of this illness.  

Is Charlie Sheen imitating the Typical Liberal, or is he the

T y p i c a l   L i b e r a l ?

Typical Liberal

Can you tell the difference between the two of them?

(I can’t)

Perhaps MSNBC will consider Charlie Sheen to fill the slot left by Keith Olbermann.

One can never predict what the Looney Left might do next, but for now at least we have a Liberal Poster Child

After all, isn’t it really just all about

W  I  N  N  I  N  G

  • Related Articles:

Voting American: It’s about Freedom

I am an “American” free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold

Time to pick up the Pieces America

We need to Fix this Now

Like I said America,

It’s  about  Freedom


Political Correctness Silencing Free Speech

AMERICA MUTED!

Once again American‘s find themselves in the “Cross Hairs” of the Liberal PC Police. Yesterday CNN had to “Target” a speaker on one of their broadcasts and apologize to their Viewers for the use of an Offensive Word. I cannot tell you what that word was for fear of provoking some “Nut Job” into committing a violent crime.

Examples of Hate Speech in America

Should “Target” Stores Change Their Name?

Liberal Political Correctness Police

Thank Goodness we have the Kind and Gentile Journalists at MSNBC

Perhaps they should change their name to MSN-PC?

Our Children’s  History Books have been Politically Corrected and we have all see the results of that over the past twenty or thirty years haven’t we?

Let’s take a look at other Political Correctness Changes we have seen in Our America

I wonder what the Liberals will do next to try and silence US?

Seems the Liberals own the most if not all of the Violent Rhetoric and Hate Speech in America and yet they continue to point their finger at the Right!

Rational American’s have Reasoned that it is only a small Minority of Liberals who are creating all of the Violence and Rhetoric in America and we are not going to remain silent any longer!


To all you Elitist Liberals out there in Kool-Aid Land I have only one thing to say to you:

I am an “American” free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold

Sarah Palin won’t Sit Down and She won’t Shut Up

The Liberal’s Greatest Fear

Sarah Palin

In her first interview following the horrific shooting in Arizona, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin spoke to Fox NewsSean Hannity who asked her to explain her “blood libel” comments following the shooting and her political action committee’s use of “cross-hairs” to target congressional districts during the 2010 midterm elections.

Exclusive: Sarah Palin on ‘Hannity

The Liberals are and have been in a Frenzied state of Hate Mongering  ever since Sarah Palin came on to the Nation Scene. They wreak with the smell of fear as this potential contender poses the greatest threat to Barack Obama and the Socialist Movement in the United States of America.  We have had to endure eight years of Bush bashing from these left-wing loons and now are seeing them in a fevered pitch unlike anything we had seen during the Bush years in the White House.

So what is the Greatest Fear in Liberal America?

A Conservative Woman with Values and Determination!

Press on Sarah Palin!

“We the People”

Have got your Back