OBAMAGATE: President Issues Executive Order releasing Eric Holder from Congressional Contempt Charges

Hat tip to The Blaze and Fox News  for these Breaking News Reports

President Obama Grants Executive Privilege to Eric Holder Over ‘Fast and Furious’Documents

(The Blaze/AP) – Fox News is reporting the President Obama has granted Attorney General Eric Holder executive privilege on documents pertaining to Operation “Fast and Furious.”

Holder recently agreed to provide additional subpoenaed documents to members of Congress, including Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), however, the latest move indicates the attorney general has no intention of making good on his promise.

Watch (LIVE) the House committee meeting to consider Holder contempt citation here.

In a letter to President Obama, Holder wrote, “I am writing to request that you assert executive privilege with respect to confidential Department of Justice (“Department”) documents that are responsive to the subpoena issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the United States House of Representatives (“Committee”) on October 25, 2011. The subpoena relates to the Committee’s investigation into Operation Fast and Furious, a law enforcement operation conducted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”) and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona to stem the illegal flow of firearms from the United States to drug cartels in Mexico (“Fast and Furious”).”

“The documents at issue fit squarely within the scope of executive privilege. In connection with prior assertions of executive privilege, two Attorneys General have advised the President that documents of this kind are within the scope of executive privilege.”

Read the full letter here.

The House Committee on Oversight and Government reform is expected to take a vote on whether or not to charge Holder with contempt today at a 10 a.m. meeting.

During the hearing, Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) argued invoking executive privilege brings into question whether or not Holder and Obama both were aware of Fast and Furious.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) called the contempt vote a “witch hunt.” She also later argued for stricter  gun laws.

“I am horrified that you are going forward with this contempt charge when the President of the United States and the administration has invoked executive privilege,” she said. “The Attorney General is being attacked for protecting documents that he is prohibited by law from producing.”

Judge Andrew Napolitano on Fox News made the argument that the use of executive privilege may be a lose-lose situation for the attorney general.

“If the President was not personally involved, executive privilege does not apply. If the President was personally involved, and they want to argue that fighting drug gangs at the border is a matter of sensitive national security, then they at least have an argument for executive privilege but that would be at odds with what Attorney General Holder has already testified to under oath,” he said. “Then he’d be in a lot of hot water.”

Napolitano’s assertion comes near the end of this Fox News report:

Obama asserted executive privilege for the first time Wednesday. He applied the presidential power to withhold documents a House committee is seeking in an investigation of a flawed gun-smuggling probe called Operation Fast and Furious.

Presidents have the right to invoke executive privilege to preserve the confidentiality of information and documents in the face of legislative inquiries. The White House says presidents have asserted that privilege 25 times since 1980.

Here’s a look at how many times each president since Ronald Reagan have asserted executive privilege:

President Barack Obama: 1

President George W. Bush: 6

President Bill Clinton: 14

President George H.W. Bush: 1

President Ronald Reagan: 3

The Associate Press contributed to this report.

This is a breaking story and updates will be added.


Issa pushes ahead with Holder contempt vote despite Obama intervention

Rep. Darrell Issa pressed ahead with a committee vote Wednesday to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress, despite an 11th-hour move by President Obama to exert executive privilege over the Fast and Furious documents at the heart of the dispute. 

The announcement instantly touched off a caustic debate on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, as Democrats accused Issa of prosecuting a “political witch hunt” and Republicans stepped up their criticism of Holder’s “stonewalling” over the Fast and Furious probe. Even for Washington, the tone at the hearing was decidedly bitter and accusatory. 

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee was first informed of the president’s decision to exert executive privilege in a letter Wednesday morning, shortly before the contempt vote was scheduled. 

Issa said committee staff are evaluating the letter but described the move as too little, too late as he and other GOP lawmakers questioned the basis for the assertion. 

“This untimely assertion by the Justice Department falls short of any reason to delay today’s proceedings,” Issa said. 

Issa accused the Justice Department of trying to compel the committee to close its investigation in exchange for documents it hasn’t yet seen. “I can’t accept that deal. No other committee chairman would,” he said. 

But Issa’s Democratic counterpart, Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., fired back that Holder never made such a demand — a Justice official also refuted Issa’s claim — and said the attorney general had come to the committee in “good faith” to try and work out an agreement. 

Cummings said the upcoming contempt vote has “diminished” the prestige of the panel. “For the past year, you’ve been holding the attorney general to an impossible standard,” he said, addressing Issa. “Mr. Chairman, it did not have to be this way. It really didn’t.” 

Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., added that she was “horrified” by the panel’s looming vote, calling it a “political witch hunt” and accusing Republicans of “overruling” the president. 

If the vote proceeds, Republicans have more than enough votes on committee to pass the contempt resolution. However, Holder would not be considered held in contempt of Congress unless and until the full House approves the measure. 

The move by Holder and Obama to lock down some requested documents only complicates the fight over the botched anti-gunrunning operation between the legislative and executive branches. 

After Holder made the request to Obama via letter on Tuesday, Deputy Attorney General James Cole wrote to Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., on Wednesday informing him that the president has granted the request. 

“We regret that we have arrived at this point, after the many steps we have taken to address the committee’s concerns and to accommodate the committee’s legitimate oversight interests regarding Operation Fast and Furious,” Cole wrote. “Although we are deeply disappointed that the committee appears intent on proceeding with a contempt vote, the department remains willing to work with the committee to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution of the outstanding issues.”

Obama’s decision pertains to documents from February 2011 and afterward examining how Justice officials learned about the Fast and Furious probe.  

Holder, in his letter to Obama requesting he assert executive privilege, said those documents pertain to the “deliberative process” on how to respond to congressional and media inquiries. 

Wednesday’s developments follow a flurry of activity Tuesday, as Holder tried to negotiate a way to avert the contempt proceedings. Issa had earlier indicated a willingness to postpone the vote after Holder indicated a willingness to make compromises and supply some documents in response to House Republicans’ subpoena. 

But Issa told reporters after a roughly 20-minute meeting with Holder Tuesday that the attorney general instead briefed them on the documents in lieu of delivering them. 

Issa told Fox News that Holder didn’t provide “anything in writing,” and said the family of murdered Border Patrol agent Brian Terry wants the documents as much as he does. 

“We want the documents. Brian Terry’s family would like the documents that are responsive to how in fact their son was gunned down with weapons that came from lawful dealers but at the … behest of the Justice Department,” Issa told Fox News. Weapons from the Fast and Furious anti-gunrunning operation were found at Terry’s murder scene. 

Issa further said during the committee meeting Wednesday that the purpose of the probe “has never been to hold the attorney general in contempt.” He said the committee had an aide on Capitol Hill all night in the hope that the Justice Department might send over documents to the panel. 

The failed Fast and Furious operation attempted selling thousands of guns to arms dealers along the U.S.-Mexico border to trace them to leaders of drug cartels. However, many of them showed up in crime scenes. 

Congressional investigators have been trying to determine if and when high-level Justice officials knew about problems with the operation. 

Holder said Issa rejected what he thought was “an extraordinary offer.” Holder called for the Capitol Hill meeting late Monday in a possible attempt to make a deal with Issa and avoid the contempt vote. 

“We offered the documents that we thought would resolve the subpoenas,” he said. “The ball is in their court.” 

The contempt vote in the oversight committee will likely pass considering Republicans outnumber Democrats 22 to 16. 

GOP House leadership has given Issa the green light to proceed how he sees fit, sources told Fox News, which suggests the vote would reach the House floor. 

Issa had demanded to see a trove of documents on the controversial Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives operation. He also wants to know who prepared a now-retracted letter from Feb. 4, 2011, in which the department claimed the U.S. did not knowingly help smuggle guns to Mexico, including those found where Terry was killed. 

Issa wrote back to Holder later Monday requesting he deliver roughly 1,300 documents pertaining to the Feb. 4 letter. The letter also stated Holder needed to deliver a description of all the documents he will not produce. 

Fox News’ William LaJeunesse and Chad Pergram contributed to this report


29 responses to “OBAMAGATE: President Issues Executive Order releasing Eric Holder from Congressional Contempt Charges

  1. Good Afternoon America ;)

    WHAT NEXT ??????????????????


  2. Obviously they have something to hide, most likely Obama’s direct involvement.


    • I hope this whole thing blows up in their faces and brings about Obama’s Resignation before the November Elections!


      • He’s too arrogant to resign.
        He will create a situation in this Country that will provide him with an opportunity to invoke Martial Law before he ever resigns.
        Maybe that is the point that the Congress will move to impeach.


  3. Pingback: Holder and Obama claim Executive Privilege « Musings of the Angry Webmaster

  4. Thank you to my friends at the Busy Post for the link back.


  5. It’s sickening isn’t it? I think the time for talk is over. Impeachment proceedings need to begin.


  6. Holder has been found in contempt of congress…and then oblamer issues an exec privilege on the doc’s for the fast and furious case…sounds to me like oblamer is in this up to his eyebrows…this must go all the way up to Barry…this is much worse than watergate..Oblamer is nothing more than a common street corner thug….ABO/OMG


  7. Some interesting stuff and Snopes does not say it is false. Just who does it belong to!!!!!! Jean Luwig or Barack Hussein Obama SSN#042-68-4425. An investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose social security number above is being used by President Obama. The man’s name is Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the US in 1924, and was assigned SSN#042-68-4425 Obama’s current SSN recorded on or about March 1977. Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents. Obama never lived or worked in that state. Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. Now comes the best part! JP. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died. Conveniently, Obama’s grandmother Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSN’s of deceased individuals. The SS Administration was never informed of Ludwig’s death, and because he never received SS benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised. The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate records until she found someone who died who was not receiving SS benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’s Connecticut SSN for Obama. Something to think about anyway.


    • This most certainly is something to think about Ron and thank you for sharing this with us.

      Sadly the cloak of secrecy remains intact and the media refuses to have a conversation about this. Where is our Congress or the GOP when it comes to Vetting Obama?


  8. On topic but a slight diversion.
    I know you’re a fan of the Blaze, Sam.
    They have another example of Michelle Malkin taking on Tamara Holder on the Sean Hannity show.
    Michelle kicks butt !
    I didn’t see it as I have almost given up on Hannity due to the incessant commercials. I CAN’T TAKE IT !!!
    I had decided to watch a show on PBS concerning the development of the telescope instead. It was great…..no commercials !


    • I hear you on the commercials AFVET. I too sometimes switch over to PBS just for a break from it all. I did see Hannity last night and was quite taken back at just how aggressive Michelle Malkin has become. OOhrah for her is all I can say.

      Also: Righthook just published her third part on Obama’s Marxism so take a look see when you can.


  9. Now Pelosi is claiming this is some elaborate scheme to suppress voter rights. What a wacko…


  10. Part 3 of my Marxism and the Obama Administration is up. http://righthook38.wordpress.com.


  11. Pingback: OBAMAGATE: The Question of Executive Privilege or Obstructing Justice? | Village of the Banned

  12. Pingback: Brian Terry’s Parents Speak Out against President Obama and Eric Holder | Voting American

  13. Pingback: Voting American Resource Center Presents………. Fact Checking Barack Obama with 580 Links | Voting American